Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Emergency

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2025. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Climate Change
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Environmental Justice
    • Greener Living
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History
    • Staff Directory

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. News Releases

Power Plant Environmental Justice Screening Methodology

This example highlights the census block groups that are downwind of single power plant unit
Example paths of emissions from a single power plant, highlighting the broad geographic range and frequency of potential exposure over time.

EPA’s Power Plant Environmental Justice Screening Methodology incorporates several peer-reviewed approaches that combine air quality modeling with environmental burden and population characteristics data to: 

  • Identify and connect power plants to geographic areas potentially exposed to air pollution by those power plants.
  • Quantify the relative potential for environmental justice concern in those areas. 

This information enables EPA to provide a screening-level look at the relative potential for power plants to affect areas of potential EJ concern and is categorized into two main efforts.

Identifying Areas Exposed to Air Pollution from Individual Power Plants

To identify the areas (census block groups) potentially affected by air pollution from each power plant, we look at a range of distances from each power plant, informed by modeling that estimates where air pollution travels. EPA uses two different models to estimate the range of different types of pollutants:

  • For air pollutants in the vicinity of each power plant (like toxics), EPA uses AERMOD to estimate distances at which pollution concentrations likely begin to diminish. For each power plant, this provides different distances that can be used to identify census block groups that might be exposed to these pollutants. 
  • For other air pollutants, which can travel much further, EPA uses HYSPLIT to estimate the various pathways the pollutants can take over a 24-hour period. This allows us to identify the census block groups that might be exposed to pollution from each power plant and estimate the relative potential for exposure.

Each of these approaches uses air quality modeling combined with GIS analysis to identify census block groups that are potentially exposed to air pollution from each of the power plants.

Identifying Areas of Potential EJ Concern

EPA also identified areas of potential EJ concern within areas that are potentially exposed. To identify which areas of the country might have EJ concerns, and the relative extent of those potential concerns, we look at several different indicators of environmental burden and population characteristics of census block groups across the U.S. Combining this information in different ways helps us approach this from two different perspectives:

  • A cumulative impact perspective, which considers the extent of existing pollution burden and social vulnerability to that pollution.
  • A social vulnerability perspective, which focuses solely on potential social vulnerability regardless of the amount of potential environmental burden.

Quantification of cumulative impacts and social vulnerability are areas of active research, so this methodology should be viewed as an initial effort to evaluate these concepts to allow relative comparisons nationally at a census block group resolution.

Potential Uses: Power Plant Screening

One application is to combine this information in a way that screens power plants based on the relative potential for EJ concern in the areas exposed to air pollution by each plant.

For example, we developed two potential EJ scoring approaches that can be used to rank power plants. The first method screens power plants based on their potential to affect the greatest number of overburdened people. This considers how many people are potentially exposed to air pollution by each plant, and the current extent to which those people are both exposed to pollution and vulnerable to pollution exposure. The second method screens the plants based on the potential to affect the most vulnerable people on average. This considers the social vulnerability of the average person living in an area that has the potential to be exposed to air pollution by each plant.

 Documentation

For more information about the Power Plant Environmental Justice Screening Methodology and the June 2023 peer review process:

  • Power Plant Environmental Justice Screening Methodology Peer Review Report (pdf) (2.63 MB, June, 2023)
  • EPA responded to comments developed through the peer review process:​​​​​​ 
    Responses to Peer Review (pdf) (439.39 KB, June, 2023)
  • This documentation contains detailed information about the technical and analytical considerations that informed the development of PPSM: Screening Ranking Documentation Draft (pdf) (4.41 MB, September, 2023)
    • Appendix I (xlsx) (50.34 KB) includes scores for each power plant included in the peer-reviewed methodology: 
    • Appendix II (xlsx) (643.91 KB) includes all the power plants in the peer-reviewed methodology: 

◀ Return to Power Plants and Environmental Justice page

Clean Air Power Sector Programs

  • Basic Info & Site Map
  • Electric Power Sector Basics
    • Power Sector Evolution
    • Health & Environmental Impacts
    • Power Sector Programs
  • Programs & Progress
    • Progress Report
    • Power Plant Emissions Reductions
    • Latest Emission Comparisons
  • Program Implementation
  • Data & Tools
    • Power Sector Data
    • Summary Data
    • Allowance Data
    • Power Plants and Environmental Justice
    • Environmental Monitoring
Contact Us About Clean Air Power Sector Programs
Contact Us About Clean Air Power Sector Programs to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on September 19, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Ayuda
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • Aide
  • Asistans
  • Korean
  • Assistência
  • Russian
  • Tulong
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.